Saturday, April 10, 2010
The Case: Cousins v. Lockyer, 568 F. 3d 1063
See also:California law is also clear that qualified immunity does not apply to state civil rights claims... [Citation omitted] "qualified immunity of the kind applied to actions brought under 42 U.S.C. §1983 does not apply to actions brought under [the Bane Act]"). In other words, qualified immunity is a doctrine of federal common law and, as such, has no application to Cousins' state claims, which are subject only to state statutory immunities.
Venegas v. County of L.A., 153 Cal.App.4th 1230, (2007) (quoting Ogborn v. City of Lancaster, 101 Cal.App.4th 448 (2002).
Thursday, April 8, 2010
The first applicable principle...
"[I]n California, all government tort liability must be based on statute...." (Lopez v. Southern Cal. Rapid Transit Dist., supra, 40 Cal.3d at p. 785, fn. 2, citation omitted.)" Leger v. Stockton Unified School Dist., 202 Cal. App. 3d 1448
Sunday, April 4, 2010
ABOUT CONSPIRACIES: In a state law cause of action (California)
A Conspiracy is "a legal doctrine that imposes liability on persons who, although not actually committing a tort themselves, share with the immediate tortfeasors a common plan or design in its perpetration. [Citation.] By participation in a civil conspiracy, a co-conspirator effectively adopts as his or her own the torts of other co conspirators within the ambit of the conspiracy. [Citation.] In this way, a co-conspirator incurs tort liability co-equal with the immediate tortfeasors." (Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 503, 510-511." State of California ex rel. Harris v. PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP 48 Cal.Rptr.3d 144 (2006).The Statue of Limitations...
"[w]hen liability is premised on a civil conspiracy the statute of limitations does not commence "until the 'last overt act' pursuant to the conspiracy has been completed." (Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 773, 786; see Molko v. Holy Spirit Assn. (1988) 46 Cal.3d 1092, 1127.)WARNING